II. Hacking Attack on Google in China
III. Google in China, Now
IV. Conflict between Google and the opponents
V. Conclusion
1. Maintain doing business in china
2. Exit from China
3. Our recommendations
References
Opponents’ perspective, which includes human rights activists, is that Google is following the Friedman Doctrine. They asserted that Google decided to stay in China because of the opportunity they can get and to increase profits. They argued that Google could not fully guarantee and provide the rights to know, and also violate its principles. This is also related to the rights theories, which is that “human beings have fundamental rights and privileges that transcend national boundaries and cultures.” People who oppose Google’s decision also support righteous moralist concept because they think Google should follow the US’ standards even if they operate in China.
As a result negotiations between Chinese officials and Google over government censorship have reached to a difficult situation, and made Google to end up with shutting down its Chinese search engine.
Wolfgang Benedek, Veronika Bauer & Matthias Kettemann, Book: Internet Governance and the Information Society, P. 101, http://books.google.com
Jeremiah Marquez, http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/internet-firm-in-china-stops- using/961104/, Daily Finance, March 23, 2010.
BERA TE, http://inewp.com/?p=1811&cpage=1, iNEWP.com, March 22, 2010.
Charles W. L. Hill, “Global Business Today,” Sixth Edition, P. 144
Charles W. L. Hill, “Global Business Today,” Sixth Edition, P. 145
Sharon La Franiere, “China Issues Warning to Major Partners of Google”, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/world/asia/15google.html, March 14, 2010
By comscore, http://www.comscore.com, Andrew Lipsman ,Director, Marketing Communications, Feburay 01/12/2009
By comscore, http://www.comscore.com, Andrew Lipsman ,Director, Marketing Communications, 08/14/2009

분야