2.Case Description
3.Analytic Negotiation Framework
4. Analytic and Discussion
5.Policy Implications
6.Conclusion
The company's goal is the growth of the company.
So downsizing is the best because of reduction of appropriation.
they do not want to go to the worst position that a compromise could be persuaded to compromise
union and management have a shared interest in reach agreement as soon as possible
they successfully dealt with the problem independently of the relationship
union want somehow down rating pay cuts, otherwise the company want somehow reduce there wages.
The union should have understand company's financial hardship
The company should have paid the employees within save company's pocket
This negotiation's problem is the company's layoff notification
workers are expected to walk off the job
Company should solve this problem
1. The company actively accept for labor's participation in management
2. The workers actively participate in company policy
Hard Negotiation = difficult to agreement
Demand through conversation
Negotiation take place so frequently.
We think that how apply negotiation theory to some case
이찬열(2004)⌜한국의 노사관계 개혁방안 : 노사정위원회 중심으로⌟ 석사학위논문
송형석(20104.1) ‘금호타이어 노사 극적 합의…파국은 면해’ 한국경제
http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=2010041873161
김재섭(2010.4.1) ‘금호타이어 노사협상 타결..파업 철회’
http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=101&oid=001&aid=0003202254
민중의 소리 : vop.co.kr
http://blog.naver.com/ryanplee?Redirect=Log&logNo=140104236154

분야